Newsletter

Newsletter Subscription Page

Please use the form below to subscribe to the Molecular Connectivity Newsletter:

Newsletter Archive

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: July/August 2026

Molecular Connectivity Working Group Newsletter

July/August 2026

Greetings from the MCWG!


Upcoming MCOS

We would like to let our community know that there will be a short summer pause in our regular online MCOS activities. This break offers an opportunity to rest, reflect, and prepare for an exciting new season ahead.

We look forward to returning in September 2026 with a fresh series of online talks, discussions, and community conversations. Thank you for your continued support and participation throughout the year. We wish everyone a relaxing and enjoyable summer holiday season and look forward to reconnecting with you soon.


👩🏻‍🔬 People of MCWG

Each month, we will feature a member of the MCWG and have a brief Q&A!

This month please enjoy our highlight of Dr Arianna Sala, member of the MCWG Steering Committee.

Dr Sala is currently a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Liège, Belgium. She has a background in neuroscience and earned her PhD in Molecular Medicine from Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (Italy), where she investigated molecular biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. After research stays at Karolinska Institutet (Sweden) and the Technical University of Munich (Germany), she joined the Coma Science Group to study brain molecular alterations in disorders of consciousness. Together with Igor Yakushev, she founded the Molecular Connectivity Working Group.

Dr Sala has graciously responded to our feature questionnaire:

What sparked your interest in molecular imaging or led you to focus on research in molecular imaging?

This happened a bit by chance – or luck! Strangely enough, I landed on molecular imaging because of brain connectivity.

During my Master’s studies, I became particularly interested in connectomics (kudos to Networks of the Brain by Olaf Sporns) and had the opportunity to work on a Master’s thesis on connectomics under the supervision of Daniela Perani and Silvia Caminiti. 

The special aspect of this project was that connectomics was applied to molecular imaging data rather than the more “traditional” fMRI data. I did not know much of molecular imaging at the time, but I remember Professor Perani describing the project as “challenging”. I’ve always enjoyed a good challenge, so how could I say no?

From there (after attending a wonderful PET course with Federico Turkheimer and Mattia Veronese), things evolved quite naturally. Looking back, it was a fortunate series of opportunities that set my path towards working with the best neuroimaging modality! 

What is your role in the Molecular Connectivity Working Group, and what have you been contributing to or working on within the group?

As co-head of the Molecular Connectivity Working Group, I mainly coordinate activities across our community together with Igor Yakushev. It’s a surprisingly diverse role because coordination also means being ready to roll up my sleeves whenever needed: I try my best to help run things smoothly, whether that’s contributing to scientific papers, organizing scientific and educational events, developing resources for the community, writing grants, or simply connecting people with complementary expertise.

My role has changed quite a bit since the group’s foundation. In its early days, “hands-on” activities were a big part of my work in the group. I’m glad to see how much the group has grown over the years – today, we have a committed team of enthusiastic scientists taking the lead on many of these initiatives.

What scientist or scientific achievement do you most admire?

One scientist I particularly admire is Lucia Melloni (Max Planck Institute and New York University). I find her approach to doing science especially inspiring. Her adversarial collaboration initiative – where researchers with competing hypotheses work together – captures what I believe science should be: a willingness to challenge our own assumptions, prioritize objective evidence over individual viewpoints, and recognize that scientific progress is driven by collaboration rather than competition.

This is very much the mindset with which Igor and I founded the Molecular Connectivity Working Group. We wanted to create a community where researchers from different backgrounds and perspectives could work collectively to advance the field, while committing to scientific excellence and the highest standards – or, where those standards did not yet exist, to create them ourselves (working on it!).


🔊 Doctoral Candidate Position!

Dear Colleagues,

We are delighted to announce the call for applications to the doctoral candidate position in Edinburgh for the PREFERENCE project is now open! This is a highly prestigious MSCA doctoral network coordinated by Ronald Boellaard with 15 doctoral candidates distributed across multiple institutions in Europe. The doctoral candidate in Edinburgh will work on development of new methodologies for whole-body network analysis of LAFOV PET datasets, and will be embedded into the PET is Wonderful team in Edinburgh.

Please find out more at the job post and the website: https://preference-consortium.eu/ 

There are brain focused project positions available: https://preference-consortium.eu/?page_id=269 

The deadline for application is the 1st November 2026.


🌟 MCWG – OHBM 2026 Highlights 🌟

Educational Course: Multimodal Integration in Human Brain Mapping
Bordeaux June 14th, 2026

Organizers: Prof Dr Joana B Pereira and Dr Arianna Sala

You can find the 📚 Course Materials Here!!

Symposium: Molecular Connectivity: Best practices for data analysis
Bordeaux June 19th, 2026

Following the OHBM annual meeting in Bordeaux, we stayed on for the Best Practices Symposium to explore advancements in molecular data processing and analysis. The event sparked excellent discussions and provided valuable insights for everyone who attended.


🗄️ Dataset Alert!! 🔊

An open dataset of cerebral tau deposition in young healthy adults based on [18F]MK6240 positron emission tomography

Dataset link

Lam and colleagues present a dataset of 33 young to middle-age healthy adults (mean age 34.0 ± 10.4 years, 12 female) with [18F]MK6240 PET data and T1w magnetic resonance imaging. Longitudinal data are also available in a subset of 9 participants with a minimum follow-up time of 1 year. Our dataset aims to support imaging biomarker studies on younger individuals potentially at risk for AD and to advance work in tauopathies affecting non-geriatric populations generally excluded from neurodegeneration studies.

Read the full publication in Scientific Data.

Just a reminder to the community that MCWG also has a vast list of open dataset available for anyone interested in exploring, building, or conducting research: Imaging Datasets


🧠 New Studies Spotlight

📝Network-based disease fingerprinting with neuroinflammation PET imaging

This study by Barzon and colleagues aimed at developing a novel data-driven approach to generate single-subject TSPO similarity matrices, applying this framework to a large dataset of 528 PET scans acquired with different radiotracers, across multiple sites and scanners.

Read the full study in Journal of Neuroinflammation.

Key Findings:

  • Despite the heterogeneity of radiotracers, scanners, and acquisition protocols, results were consistent across healthy individuals. However, a clear cohort effect was observed, highlighting the importance of accounting for site- and scanner-specific factors.
  • TSPO PET network-based features were demonstrated to reliably distinguish neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders from healthy individuals. The brain regions contributing most to disease classification closely reflected the known pathophysiological mechanisms of each disorder, showing the disease-specific nature of the identified patterns.
  • The specificity of PET signal, combined with the inherently multivariate nature of network-based approaches, enables the detection of subject-specific patterns that may extend beyond the capabilities of traditional univariate neuroimaging analyses.

📝Dopaminergic nigrostriatal vulnerability in Parkinson’s Disease with diabetes: evidence from severity-matched cohorts

In this study by Galli and colleagues, Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with and without diabetes were scanned with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT to assess the effect of diabetes in the nigrostriatal pathways in two independent cohorts using graph theory analysis.

Read the full study in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Key Findings:

  • Due to the dopaminergic impairment of striatal structures and the relative preservation of cortical motor areas, changes in connectivity are unlikely to reflect primary cortical dopaminergic pathology. Instead, they represent network-level alterations in regions affected in PD, possibly due to compensatory mechanisms of the disease.
  • Assessment of PD patients vs controls showed weaker connections in subcortical regions, consistent with impaired communication within nigrostriatal pathway.
  • Diabetes may negatively modulate the nigrostriatal system, compromising resilience and accelerating neurodegeneration in PD.

📝Investigating AD and non-AD 18F-Flortaucipir distribution patterns in a memory clinic cohort

Piva and colleagues aimed at differentiating amyloid positive and negative individuals using 18F-Flortaucipir PET using spatial covariance pattern through scaled subprofile modelling using principal component analysis (SSM/PCA) disease patterns (DP).

Read the full study in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Key Findings:

  • While the amyloid positive DPs showed a clear cortical pattern, amyloid negative individuals presented more diffuse and less intense signal, primarily involving subcortical white matter and grey matter regions.
  • While traditional univariate analysis showed no significant differences between amyloid- and tau-negative individuals and amyloid-negative and tau-positive patients, DP expression scores were able differentiate between these groups.
  • 18F-Flortaucipir DP scores may provide information on both A and T statuses, supporting its potential use as first and possibly sole examination in the investigation of suspected AD.

📝Individual-level metabolic connectivity captures cortical morphology and their coupling strengthens in the ageing brain

This study by Facca and colleagues integrated FDG PET and structural MRI data to investigate how cortical morphology constrains large-scale patterns of metabolic connectivity across the human lifespan by demonstrating a global alignment between metabolic connectivity and morphological similarity.

Read the full study in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Key Findings:

  • The observed correspondence between metabolic connectivity and cortical morphology indicates a fundamental coupling between structural and metabolic coordination in the human brain.
  • There is a progressive strengthening of this coupling with age. This pattern suggests that the coordination of metabolism becomes increasingly governed by cortical morphology over the adult lifespan.
  • Quantifying morphology-metabolism correspondence may provide a translational marker of neuroenergetic integrity. Such an approach could improve the interpretation of metabolic alterations in aging and disease, helping distinguish primary metabolic dysregulation from structural deterioration.

📝Age-related changes to brain energetics revealed by PET/MRI imaging

Bevington and colleagues investigated age-related alterations to brain energetics by jointly analysing cerebral glucose metabolism and blood flow data, defining novel metrics that capture regional variability in processes related to relative energy production and relative aerobic glycolysis.

Read the full study in NeuroImage: Clinical.

Key Findings:

  • The authors introduce novel metrics of relative energy production and relative aerobic production.
  • Spatial covariance pattern analysis of FDG PET and arterial spin labelling images captures age-related alterations in these measures.
  • A subset of regional changes show similarity to well-known neurodegenerative alterations of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases.

Call for announcements, job opportunities, information and news!

The MCWG Outreach Council invites you to submit announcements or information about papers, conferences, presentations or other events or news related to brain and molecular connectivity as well as any positions available or job opportunities that you wish to publicize and share with the community!

Please submit any material for consideration by the final day of each month using this form – thank you!


Who we are

The MCWG is made up of four international and multidisciplinary councils dedicated to promoting molecular connectivity research via dissemination of methods, results, collaboration, and resource sharing (e.g. datasets, tools) within the scientific community. We encourage the neuroscientific community to take an integrative perspective in study of the brain connectome, where various methods including MRI-based techniques, electrophysiological tools, and molecular imaging advance our understanding of the brain. Please find fundamental questions outlined here: “Brain connectomics: time for a molecular imaging perspective?”

Our website can be found here. We also invite you to join the MCWG!


Sharing is caring!

Please feel free to share our newsletter with friends and colleagues!


Follow us on Social Media

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: June 2026

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: May 2026

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: April 2026

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: March 2026

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: February 2026

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: January 2026

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: December 2025

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: November 2025

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: October 2025

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: September 2025

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: August 2025

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: June 2025

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: May 2025

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: April 2025

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: March 2025

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: February 2025

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: January 2025

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: December 2024

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: November 2024

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: October 2024

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: September 2024

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: June 2024

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: May 2024

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: April 2024

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: March 2024

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: February 2024

[MCWG] Molecular Connectivity Newsletter: January 2024